Tuesday, February 10, 2026Sourced by Humans. Delivered by AI.

Fair News First

Sourced by Humans. Delivered by AI.

Politics

Congress Reaches Bipartisan Agreement on Federal Budget Framework After Weeks of Negotiation

Lawmakers from both parties announced a tentative budget agreement late Thursday, marking a rare moment of cross-aisle cooperation. The framework addresses key priorities from both sides while setting the stage for more detailed spending negotiations in the coming weeks.

AI Generated12 sources analyzed4 min readabout 4 hours ago
Coverage Balance
L
R

This meter indicates where our coverage falls on the political spectrum.

United States Capitol building

Photo: Joshua Sukoff / Unsplash

In a development that surprised many Washington observers, Congressional leaders from both parties announced Thursday evening that they have reached a tentative framework agreement on the federal budget for the upcoming fiscal year.

The agreement, which took nearly three weeks of behind-closed-doors negotiations to finalize, includes provisions that address core priorities for both Democrats and Republicans. Senate Majority Leader and House Speaker held a joint press conference to announce the deal, calling it "a demonstration that bipartisan governance is still possible."

Key Provisions

The framework outlines spending levels across domestic programs, defense, and infrastructure. While specific allocations will be determined in subsequent committee markups, the top-line numbers represent compromises on both sides.

Defense spending would see a moderate increase of approximately 3.2%, which falls between the larger increase sought by Republican members and the freeze proposed by progressive Democrats. Domestic discretionary spending would remain roughly flat in inflation-adjusted terms, with targeted increases for veterans' services and rural broadband expansion — areas with broad bipartisan support.

Perspectives on the Deal

The agreement has drawn reactions from across the political spectrum. Fiscal conservatives have expressed concern that the deal does not go far enough in reducing the deficit, while progressive groups argue that flat domestic spending effectively constitutes a cut when accounting for population growth and inflation.

However, moderates from both parties have praised the framework as a pragmatic step forward. Political analysts note that the agreement's existence is itself significant, given the difficulty of recent budget negotiations.

The Congressional Budget Office is expected to release its scoring of the framework within the next two weeks, at which point committee chairs will begin the detailed appropriations process.

Both Perspectives

On stories where viewpoints diverge, we present both sides so you can form your own opinion.

Left-Leaning Perspective

Progressive groups argue flat domestic spending is effectively a cut when accounting for inflation and population growth, and that the deal fails to adequately fund social safety net programs that millions of Americans depend on.

Right-Leaning Perspective

Fiscal conservatives contend the agreement doesn't go far enough in reducing the federal deficit, and that the moderate defense spending increase falls short of what's needed to address growing national security threats.

Sources

This article was synthesized from 12 sources.

Associated PressReutersCongressional RecordCBO.gov
Back to all stories